[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Nick Winter <nw53@cornell.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Re: svyset for stratified probability proportional to size design |

Date |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:05:07 -0400 |

You only -svyset- one weight variable--which correspond to the ultimate probability of selection of each observation. With multiple stages of sampling, these weights will be a function of the probabilities of selection at each stage, possibly with additional corrections for non-response, etc. So the sample might be self-weighting at the first stage, but perhaps not at lower stages, resulting in non-constant weights for the ultimate observations.

So you would do something like:

. svyset psu1 [pw=weight] , str(strat1) || psu2 , fpc(fpc2) || _n , fpc(fpc3)

Note, however, that if the first stage is actually sampled with replacement, than lower-level without-replacement sampling is ignored. This will be conservative--your reported standard errors will be somewhat larger than they would otherwise be.

--Nick Winter

At 02:37 AM 8/11/2005, you wrote:

________________________________________________________We run on Stata 9, updated all July 5. We have a complex survey design data set with the first stage stratified into two parts. The primary sampling units (census tracts) have been drawn with replacement from each of the two strata with probability proportional to population size (PPS) in each of the strata. We have the total population, the population of each stratum, and the population of each PSU. There are two further stages in the sampling design, random sampling of 3 blocks within each PSU without replacement and random sampling of 2 households within each block without replacement. Our difficulty lies in specifying specifying svyset for this design, particularly selecting (or not) the pw weights for the first level. On the one hand, we read from texts that the glory of probability proportional to population sample is that it doesn't need weights. On the other hand, we see from svyset examples at the UCLA site, that considerable effort has gone into calculating the values for the first stage weights with PPS design, though without access to the text, we are unclear how to apply their example. Could any suggest how to at least set up svyset for the first stage of the above described design? Many thanks, Steve Rothenberg Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública Cuernavaca, México * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

Nicholas J. G. Winter 607.255.8819 t

Assistant Professor 607.255.4530 f

Department of Government nw53@cornell.edu e

Cornell University falcon.arts.cornell.edu/nw53 w

308 White Hall

Ithaca, NY 14853-4601

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Re: svyset for stratified probability proportional tosizedesign***From:*Steve <drlead@prodigy.net.mx>

**References**:**st: Re: svyset for stratified probability proportional to size design***From:*Steve <drlead@prodigy.net.mx>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Re: Help with CLAD - something strange.** - Next by Date:
**st: Logistic using aweigths** - Previous by thread:
**st: Re: svyset for stratified probability proportional to size design** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Re: svyset for stratified probability proportional tosizedesign** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |