[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Maarten Buis" <M.Buis@fsw.vu.nl> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: how to deal with censoring at zero (a lot of zeroes) for a laboratory re |

Date |
Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:48:56 +0200 |

Arnold kester wrote: > If you drop observations based on their value of a predictor variable > you are in fact changing the protocol of your study. The inclusion > criteria are changed to include "Troponin I is detectable". Results > would be valid for people with detectable values only. Not realy, as long as the probability of being detectable is independent of your dependent variable. With any type of regression you want to know the distribution of y conditional on x: f(y|x). However you only have information on the conditional distribution of y given x if x is detectible (D=1): f(y|x,D=1). Using the basic rules of conditional probability you can show that as long as the probability of observing x does not depend on y, i.e. Pr(D=1|y,x) = Pr(D=1|x), than f(y|x,D=1) = f(y|x). f(y|x,D=1) = f(y,x,D=1) / f(x,D=1) = { Pr(D=1|y,x)*f(y|x)*f(x) } /{ Pr(D=1|x)*f(x) } = f(y|x) * Pr(D=1|y,x)/Pr(D=1|x) If Pr(D=1|y,x) = Pr(D=1|x) than Pr(D=1|y,x) / Pr(D=1|x) =1 f(y|x,D=1) = f(y|x)*1 > If you want to get a prediction for undetectable Troponin without > assuming a specific value you could add a dummy variable troponin_zero = > (troponin == 0) and substitute (say) zero for log(troponin) when > troponin==0. The predicted value from this model is independent of what > you choose for "log(0)". Running a regression on an `imputed' missing variables and a dummy variable to indicate whether a variable was imputed or not will generally lead to biased estimates. Both points are made in one of those convenient little green sage booklets: Paul Allison (2002) Missing Data. Tousand Oaks, Sage. Hope this helps, Maarten * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: how to deal with censoring at zero (a lot of zeroes) fora laboratory re***From:*Arnold Kester <arnold.kester@stat.unimaas.nl>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Re: Integrating Stata 9 and external text editors** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: string with embedded blanks in logical expression** - Previous by thread:
**st: proposed solution to the censored-at-zero problem, and question regarding out-of-sample predictions for 'mfp'** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: how to deal with censoring at zero (a lot of zeroes) fora laboratory re** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |