[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Ronnie Babigumira" <ronnie.babigumira@umb.no> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: st: RE: Multiple responses on plot level data |

Date |
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 19:02:44 +0200 |

Thanks Nick, sorry for the lack of clarity, measure choice is my response (dependent is the term Im more farmiliar with) variable (s). I do have a set of predictor (independent) variables which I did not include in my email. Yes I did consider logit models for individual responses. I also considered constructing a dependent variable indicating whether or not any one of the choices was made. However, I have been thinking about the mlogit. So you say 8 possible choices, would that mean 1, 2, 3 for fert, man, fanyaju rspv and then 5/8 for the diffrent combinations of each. If so, doesnt isnt this a problem because the classes are not exactly independent in the sense that (say 5 if choices 2 and 3 were made on the plot) Ronnie Ronnie Babigumira Dept. of Economics and Resource Management Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB) PO Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway >>> n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 04/21/05 4:30 PM >>> I am not clear whether you regard measure choice as a predictor or a response. And in any case I can imagine situations in which both views are reasonable. Soil erosion loss could depend on conservation measures, which choice of conservation measures might depend on many things. If it were the latter, I think it is up to you how you define a composite response. Nor is it clear to me that you need do that. If this were my problem I would look at (a) logit models for the individual responses and (b) a multinomial logit for the 8 possible choices of fert[iliser?] man[ure?] and fanyaju[???]. If conservation measures are predictors, you would need to look not just at dummies but also at interactions. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Ronnie Babigumira > Something has been slowly eating away at me and at this point I have > decided to seek help from the list. I have plot level data on use of > soil conservation measures and would like to construct a "single" > dependent variable for each household for use in a multinomial logit. > The data look something like this > > hhd_id plnum fert man fanyaju > 1001 1 0 1 0 > 1001 2 0 1 1 > 1001 3 1 0 1 > 1002 1 0 0 0 > 1002 2 1 1 1 > 1003 1 1 0 0 > > Where > hhd_id: Household id > plnum: Plot number (a household may have more than one plot) > And fert, man and fanyaju are 3 possible soil conservation measures a > household may undertake (it is possible that more than one measure can > be applied to a plot) > > My question is how do I go about with constructing a single dependent > variable for use in a multinomial logit in this case (and > would this be > correct). I have considered the simplest case where I > construct a simple > dummy for each plot indicating whether or not a household > used at least > one of the measures however, I feel that it would be more > interesting if > I could say something on the determinants for the use of the different > measures * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Use of the term 'relative risk ratio'** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: RE: interpret the marginal effect of interaction term in logit model** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: Multiple responses on plot level data** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: RE: Multiple responses on plot level data** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |