[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
daneshva@ccmail.nevada.edu |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: RE: [questions on -heckman- and income decomposition] |

Date |
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:38:05 -0700 |

Thanks Stas, now I know where and what to look for. I need to learn STATA programming and do all of the algebra from scratch. Sorry about the failure to include a subject line and failure to mention where I have looked for before posting my questions. I had just subscribed to the list and my internet connection was going down, so I rushed. Again, thanks for all the comments. Nasser Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Sent by: cc: owner-statalist@hsphsun2. Subject: Re: st: RE: [questions on -heckman- and income decomposition] harvard.edu 09/28/2004 05:07 a.m. Please respond to statalist 1. The comments on the VCE underestimation are in place for two-step procedure where you generate lambda first, and then plug it in into the first equation. Then indeed the standard errors do not account for sampling variability in lambda. This was the only method feasible 25 years back, and I don't think the issue arises in the FIML procedure, which is Stata's default for -heckman-, anyway. 2. As long as all those decompositions are linear functions of the coefficients (as far as I can recall), you can get the standard errors from -lincom- command, although you would have to do all of the algebra from scratch. If there are any non-linearities involved, the goal can be achieved with -nlcom- instead. [Wishes and Grumbles section: I know of only one case of a worse general-sounding name that can be given to a very specific purpose program: I used to have -svybs- on my web page before I figured out that (i) what it does is statistically wrong, and (ii) what it does can be accomplished by the standard -bootstrap-, anyway. Decompositions are quite common in both statistics and applied areas; ANOVA decomposition of variance may be in place, and I know that people in quantitative psychology are fond of variance decompositions trying to attribute something like R^2 to every variable in the model. Shorrocks suggested Shapley decomposition as a general analytical tool for inequality and poverty analysis, and it is certainly applicable in this case, too. I am pretty sure there are many other decompositions of which I am not aware... so the title like -decompose- for a program that does only one specific decomposition does not sound right to me. Oh well... I must be in a bad mood these days, as my latest Statalist postings are mostly criticizing :). And of course Nick was right about the informative subject lines, as well as reporting one's own attempts to find relevant info in Stata's help, FAQ and Statalist archives first.] Stas > > 1. I am using Heckman model for selectivity. Heckman > > (1979, page 158) > > states that when the coefficient of the selection bias (that is the > > coefficient of inverse Mills' Ratio) is not statistically > > equal to zero, > > then the "standard" variance-covariance matrix leads to an > > understatement > > of true errors and overstatement of significance levels. In > > this case a > > correction is suggested by Heckman (pages 158-160). Wooldridge, > > Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2002, > > pages 139-141 > > discusses the same issue and provides formulas. > > > > Is there a built in commend (program) that one can > > use for the > > correction? Has any one done this? How do I get this done? > > > > 2. Ian Watson and Ben Jann have written two commands for > > decomposition > > of wage differentials. The STATA syntaxes are decomp and > > decompose. Both > > produce various components of the decomposition, but do not perform > > statistical testing of the components. Ronald L. Oaxaca and Michael > > Ransom, Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 1998, > > pages 55-61, show > > how to use delta method for obtaining standard errors of the > > components of > > wage differentials. Does STATA do this procedure? Has it been > > implemented yet? Has any user written a commend file for these tests? > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > -- Stas Kolenikov http://stas.kolenikov.name * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**st: Royston's mvis ado and version questions***From:*"Dave Purcell" <dap@pike27.net>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Question about using the Hausman test after XTREG,FE and XTREG, RE** - Next by Date:
**st: program names [was: ... questions on -heckman- and income decomposition]** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: RE: [questions on -heckman- and income decomposition]** - Next by thread:
**st: Royston's mvis ado and version questions** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |