[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Jun Xu" <mystata@hotmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
re:st: RE: Parse (translate equalities into linear transformation matrix) |

Date |
Sun, 04 Apr 2004 21:37:16 -0500 |

Nick,

Do you mean I force users to punch in their transformation matrix and restriction matrix?

Something like:

my test, tmat(....) rmat(...)

The reason why I am doing this is that I am trying to test if a particular probability is equal to some numeric values after estimating discrete choice models, and it seems that test command and even testnl command is not very applicable in this case and I try to write my own routines. Not sure if there is any template out there can solve my parsing problems. Thanks a lot.

xj.

***********************************************

Two very broad suggestions:

Why not turn the problem so that the user must input this

matrix?

Can you get -test- to do the work for you?

Nick

n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk

Jun Xu

Thanks to Nick's comments on syntax anything last time and I used several gettoken and equations get parsed. Now, I try to incorporate more comprehensive problems. A reminder of my problem and to make my problem more generic, I have d1, d2, d3...(k known number of functions derived from estimated of last estimation), and I like to test if the linear combination of d1...dk is equal to somthing, something like:_________________________________________________________________

let's assume there is d1-d5

mytest 2*d1+(3+5)*d2/2+d5*_pi=0

I can successfully parse each element before or after + or negative sign, but I couldn't figure out how to parse 2*d1, 3*d2/2, d5*_pi into matrix. It seems to me there are too many ways of writing such expressions, thereby hard to parse. The end product that I what is two matrices:

The transformation matrix: [2, (3+5)/2, 0, 0, _pi]

The d matrix: [d1, d2, d3, d4, d5]'

Well, I can easily get d matrix because I can use some info in last estimation to derive them, but the key issue here is to grab numbers or numeric expressions in those equalities, peel off d1, d2,...d5, and turn the rest part into a transformation matrix. Any suggestions? Thanks a lot.

MSN Toolbar provides one-click access to Hotmail from any Web page – FREE download! http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200413ave/direct/01/

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**re: st: ...non parametric alternative to ANOVA...** - Next by Date:
**st: Friedman test** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: Parse (translate equalities into linear transformation matrix)** - Next by thread:
**st: RE: RE: marginal effects and interactions** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |