[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Rajiv Mallick" <rmallick@hotmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: RE: ranking!! |

Date |
Tue, 03 Jun 2003 08:08:20 -0500 |

Hello Ben,

Thank you for your suggestion.

The bilateral relationship is more like "interaction" that you mentioned. So as a pair a - b would be > = < a - c. From these sets of bilateral relationship, I have to obtain where a is the greatest compared to others in the group, and say e the next and so on.

How would you assign values? Are you are suggesting that I assign values 1 through 5 in this example. In that case sum of all values for all bilateral pairs will be 15. That would give all of the same ranking. The purpose is to obtain a ranking among my original 6 members.

Regards,

Rajiv

_________________________________________________________________From: Ben.Kriechel@roa.unimaas.nl Reply-To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: RE: ranking!! Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 09:07:42 +0200 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Rajiv, I don't really understand your problem. Is the "bilateral relationship" of the kind that you imply something like a>b, a>c, and so on, or are you counting "interactions", i.e. a talks to b, a talks also to c and so on? In the former case, you can just assign values of objects dominated (i.e. a dominates five other objects), assuming transitivity you might even include indirect domination. In the latter case you can just count the number of relationships?! groetjes, Ben > -----Original Message----- > From: Rajiv Mallick [mailto:rmallick@hotmail.com] > Sent: dinsdag 3 juni 2003 0:08 > To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Subject: st: ranking!! > > > I am looking for some suggestion on how to create a ranking > scheme when one > has a following scenario. Whatever suggestion you may have > will be helpful. > > Regards, > Rajiv > > Say I have 6 objects " a b c d e f ". then i have rankings of their > bilateral relationships > > a - b > a - c > a - d > a - e > a - f > > and > > b - c > b - d > b - e > b - f > > and so on. > > In effect I have 5 rankings for each of a through f. > [Though, it may appear > that there are > 5 rankings for "a" and 4 for "b".....]. They are bilateral. > But I want to > create a multilateral rank that summerizes say "a's" ranking > over the rest, > and "b's" over the rest and so on. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.0.2i iQA/AwUBPtw8Audb8S0dfCWJEQK35QCdGqaYwEukVnu0EEfn4ab6F83aykMAoN7s btG3HFPxjVbo9zpqZXafHPEo =RO78 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**st: How to infile files from SPSS format that contain the names of variables** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: LR-tests and Xtnbreg** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: ranking!!** - Next by thread:
**st: Re: statalist-digest V4 #1267** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |