Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: RE: RE: RE: A simple but really hard question

From   Roger Newson <>
Subject   Re: st: RE: RE: RE: A simple but really hard question
Date   Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:22:33 +0000

At 21:53 30/10/02 +0000, Nick Cox wrote:
Li, Wenjun
> Thanks, everyone. A friend has suggested to use "double-octiles" for
> quantiles based on division into 16 groups of equal
> frequency. How do you
> think about this?  "Sedeciles", as suggested by Nick Cox
> [and Nick Winter], is a possible name too.

"Double-octiles" is a mix of English out of French out of
Latin and straight Latin. These linguistic mongrels
are a bad idea. (Like "television"...)

I still vote against a new term, as you are asking.
An alternative "linguistic mongrel" might be "hexadeciles", which is Graeco-Latin, but might be understood by a general numerate audience, given that we seem to be stuck with "hexadecimal". However, "sedeciles" is, of course, more correct Latin, and as such is less likely to cause long-running threads in RSS News.

Best wishes


Roger Newson
Lecturer in Medical Statistics
Department of Public Health Sciences
King's College London
5th Floor, Capital House
42 Weston Street
London SE1 3QD
United Kingdom

Tel: 020 7848 6648 International +44 20 7848 6648
Fax: 020 7848 6620 International +44 20 7848 6620
or 020 7848 6605 International +44 20 7848 6605

Opinions expressed are those of the author, not the institution.

* For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index