Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: RE: RE: RE: A simple but really hard question


From   "Don Spady" <dspady@ualberta.ca>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   Re: st: RE: RE: RE: A simple but really hard question
Date   Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:19:16 -0700

Seduciles sounds a bit sexier
Don

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Elizabeth Allred" <lizard@hsph.harvard.edu>
To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 15:05
Subject: Re: st: RE: RE: RE: A simple but really hard question


> Yes, I agree! I vote for 16 quantiles. Save sedeciles for Trivial
> Pursuit...
> 
> Nick Cox wrote:
> > 
> > Li, Wenjun
> > >
> > > Thanks, everyone. A friend has suggested to use "double-octiles" for
> > > quantiles based on division into 16 groups of equal
> > > frequency. How do you
> > > think about this?  "Sedeciles", as suggested by Nick Cox
> > > [and Nick Winter], is a possible name too.
> > 
> > "Double-octiles" is a mix of English out of French out of
> > Latin and straight Latin. These linguistic mongrels
> > are a bad idea. (Like "television"...)
> > 
> > I still vote against a new term, as you are asking.
> > 
> > Nick
> > n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk
> > 
> > *
> > *   For searches and help try:
> > *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> > *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> > *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> 

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index