| ![]() |
From | Nick Winter <nwinter@virginia.edu> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: RE: New member orientation |
Date | Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:44:54 -0400 |
I am no expert but from first principles it would seem that the information that somebody has visited the FAQ is
(1) stored in the user's own machine, at least temporarily,
and
(2) (possibly) stored somehow on the StataCorp website
as that is where the FAQ is hosted.
Setting aside all questions of feasibility, those who run Statalist have _absolutely_ no right (or desire) to hack into any user's machine, so that rules out (1) in a flash.
(2) is not quite so easy but I incline to the view that it is wrong as a matter of principle to use this information. The whole thing is too Orwellian. In any case I seriously doubt that StataCorp would want to make it available to outsiders even if that were possible, whether directly or indirectly.
More simply, just visiting the FAQ is no guarantee of close attention, so while this solution might reduce some problems, the problem is not one of website accesses, but of what is read, learnt
and inwardly digested.
Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk
SamL
Would it be prohibitively difficult technologically to prevent someone
from posting until they had actually visited the FAQ page? I know that
sounds draconian, but it is for their own good. (WOW, this just keeps
sounding worser and worser). Bad though it may sound, is it possible? If
so, then is it desirable?
Sam
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Nick Cox wrote:
I have changed the title of this thread partly because I am focusing on one specific point. Sebastian Kruk suggestedIn any case Sebastian's original titleMaybe a new subscriber should receive the FAQ as first message.
RE: Re: statalist-digest V4 #2725
is meaningless to those who do not receive the digest
and hopelessly vague to those who do. If you are
replying to a digest, please use the heading of
the specific posting you are replying to as the
basis for your subject.
Sebastian's suggestion is not one that I propose
to instigate.
New members already receive this admonition like
this:
-------------------------------------------------------
Welcome to the statalist-digest mailing list!
Please save this message for future reference. Thank you.
If you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing list,
you can send mail to <Majordomo@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> withthe followingcommand in the body of your email message:
unsubscribe statalist-digest n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk
If you ever need to get in contact with the owner of the list,
(if you have trouble unsubscribing, or have questions about the
list itself) send email to<owner-statalist-digest@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> .This is the general rule for most mailing lists when you need
to contact a human.
Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to,
in case you don't already have it:
Welcome to Statalist. We hope that you will find Statalist postings
interesting and useful, and that you may feel able to contribute.
Statalist has been going since 1994, and over that time we have
developed an FAQ which is at
http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/statalist.html
It is packed with information and, indeed, the distilled wisdom of
Statalist veterans.
Please read that FAQ at your convenience, but certainlybefore you postanything to the list. We hope you will find that acting onthe advicegiven in the FAQ will increase the chance of someone answering your questions fruitfully and keep the list pleasant for all. --------------------------------------------------- Over the years, we have experimented with various alternatives to this message. One was sending a shortened version of the FAQ with key points, but it is impossible to tell what are the key points for any new member, as points obvious or relevant to some are evidently not obvious or relevant to others. Sending the full FAQ would not be a good idea, however, for several reasons: 1. The FAQ is revised from time to time. Thus, we would need to revise the material in the welcome message everytime we tweaked the FAQ. The burden here would fall not so much on Marcello Pagano or myself but on Harvard School of Public Health personnel who do the nitty-gritty entirely as a matter of good will. 2. The FAQ is manifestly an HTML document with various links and other clickable detail. It is, we suspect, much more natural and convenient for members to look at it in their favourite browser. 3. Sending members HTML documents by email would run contrary to the Statalist philosophy, itself explained at length in the FAQ, that only plain text messages are guaranteed to be intelligible and acceptable to all members of the list. 4. Sending members an ASCII version would raise issues already explained under #1 and #2. 5. The alternative of asking new members to click on an URL or to copy and paste that into a browser is, we feel, a minimal and reasonable request.* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
-- -------------------------------------------------------------- Nicholas Winter 434.924.6994 t Assistant Professor 434.924.3359 f Department of Politics nwinter@virginia.edu e University of Virginia faculty.virginia.edu/nwinter w PO Box 400787, 100 Cabell Hall Charlottesville, VA 22904 * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
© Copyright 1996–2025 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |