Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: RE: Survival analysis: finding best cut-off values


From   Diego Bellavia <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: RE: Survival analysis: finding best cut-off values
Date   Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:46:21 +0000 (GMT)

All right !

Thank you anyway, 
At least now I know what I should not do. 

Best

Diego

----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: Nick Cox <[email protected]>
A: [email protected]
Inviato: Marted� 6 marzo 2007, 15:40:07
Oggetto: RE: st: RE: Survival analysis: finding best cut-off values


I don't know what that means. In any case, many others
on this list know much more about using Cox models than I do. 

Nick 
[email protected] 

Diego Bellavia

> mmhh, Ok.
> 
> I will not do that in the future, but then, what is the most 
> efficient way to find 
> cut-off values for predictors ? 

Nick Cox <[email protected]>

> The practice of dividing good continuous
> variables into categories is retrograde. 
> See Frank Harrell's book on "Regression modeling
> strategies" from Springer in 2001. 

Diego Bellavia

> > I am performing a survival analysis on a dataset with many 
> > variables. Multivariate cox proportional-hazard models 
> > defined the best predictors (around 7 out of 270 variables). 
> > I would like to give the readers some cut-off values 
> > they can use in the clinical practice, so I divided the most 
> > significant predictors in tertiles, create the dummy variables 
> > and run Cox models for each variable (groups of dummy vars). 
> > Doing so, I obtain significant/unsignificant tertiles and 
> > Kaplan-Meyer graphs 
> > stratified by tertiles. Thsi way works pretty well. But what 
> > if I would like to find only one cut-off per variable ? 
> > I thought to use ROC curves to define the best diagnostic 
> > cut-offs and see if they are good also for prognosis, but 
> > unfortunately not all the best
> > predictors are so good also to discriminate groups of patients. 
> > In conclusion my question is: there is a way to obtain the 
> > best prognostic cut-off value using Cox models ? 
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> 
> 
>     
> 
>     
>         
> ___________________________________ 
> L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova 
> Yahoo! Mail: 
> http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> 

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


	

	
		
___________________________________ 
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail: 
http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index