Statalist The Stata Listserver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: STATA verses Stata

From   "White, Justin" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: STATA verses Stata
Date   Wed, 1 Nov 2006 15:58:10 -0500

This is just a curiosity of mine and I may be inviting the wrath of Dr
Cox (I always seemed to get "ripped a new one" when I post even though
he tries to be as polite as possible), but according to the FAQS,
"Stata" should not be spelled with all caps.  My question is why it
matters if it is spelled STATA or Stata.

Again, this is just a curiosity of mine.

Justin White

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 3:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: st: Is Stata 9 really faster than stata 7?

Absolutely no attachments, please. 

The "no attachments" rule is explained in the FAQ
(and the spelling "Stata"). 

When you joined the list, you were explicitly asked 
to read the FAQ _before_ posting. Each posting 
distributed to the list carries a reminder of the 
location of the FAQ. Once more, please read the FAQ! 
It is really is in your best interests if you wish 
to get and keep the good will of regular members of 
the list. 

[email protected] 

Shourun Guo

> It seems that I couldn't send message with attachement to 
> statalist. If
> anyone has interest to comapre, I can email my data (Stata 7 
> format) to your
> email. Just let me know. My computer is a Compaq with AMD XP 
> 2000+ 1.67 Ghz,
> 768 MB of RAM, Windows XP Home Edition with Service Pack 2. 
> STATA version:
> 7.0 and 9.2 respectively. In Stata 9, I used -timer- to 
> measure time. In
> stata 7, I manually measured the time (-timer- is not there 
> in STATA 7).

*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index