Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: Antwort: st: Making an 'output only' logfile.


From   Ronnie Babigumira <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: Antwort: st: Making an 'output only' logfile.
Date   Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:45:08 +0200

-quietly- suppresses all terminal output for the duration of command (and this is also in the logfile). The resulting log will only have a collection of commands but Kevin would like the output without the commands

Oleksandr Talavera wrote:

help quietly

Dr. Oleksandr Talavera
DIW Berlin - Deutsches Institut f�r Wirtschaftsforschung
Department of Innovation, Industry and Services
K�nigin-Luise-Str. 5, 14195 Berlin
Phone +49-30 89789-407, Fax +49-30 89789-104
http://www.talavera.rv.ua



"Kelvin Foo" <[email protected]> Gesendet von: [email protected]
18.09.2006 12:25
Bitte antworten an
[email protected]


An
statalist <[email protected]>
Kopie

Thema
st: Making an 'output only' logfile.






Hi Everyone,

I have a do file which contains many commands such as -generate-,
-regress-, -nlcom-, etc..
I would like to run this file, and keep a log of just the output and
not the commands. How can this be done?

Kelvin.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/




*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index