Statalist The Stata Listserver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: Re: xtabond

From   "Rodrigo A. Alfaro" <>
To   <>
Subject   st: Re: xtabond
Date   Sat, 19 Aug 2006 23:51:47 -0400


You want to use Arellano-Bond procedure because in theory
you have a model like this (basic one)

y(i,t) = b*y(i,t-1) + a(i) +e(i,t)

a(i) is an unobservable cross-sectional unit effect. OK?

So far, I don't think there will be a serious problem to estimate
your dynamic binary model with -probit- or -logit- procedures. 
But becomes more complicated if you have a(i) in your model.

The solutions that I know are: -xtlogit- (fixed or random effects),
-xtprobit- (random effect) or -logit/probit- with dummies. 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bartlomiej Wojcik" <>
To: <>
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2006 7:14 PM
Subject: st: xtabond

dear stata users

my question is as follows. is xtabond procedure adequate for binary 
response variable? if not, then how can I model dynamic model with 
discrete dependent variable?

kind regards
*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2021 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index