Statalist The Stata Listserver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: estat hettest: Breusch-Pagan Test

From   "Scott Merryman" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   RE: estat hettest: Breusch-Pagan Test
Date   Mon, 3 Apr 2006 10:26:42 -0500

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:owner-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael S. Hanson
> Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 9:04 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: estat hettest: Breusch-Pagan Test


> Can anyone comment on this difference?  

Greene (Econometric Analysis, 4th ed, p. 510) remarks that "it has been
argued that the Breusch-Pagan Lagrange multiplier test is quite sensitive to
the assumption of normality.  Koenker (1981) and Koenker and Bassett (1982)
suggest that the computation of LM be based on a more robust estimator of
the variance of e_i^2..."


Koenker, R. (1981). "A note on Studentizing a test for heteroscedasticity,"
Journal of Econometrics, 17, 107-112.

Koenker, R., and G. Bassett (1982). "Robust Tests for Heteroscedasticity
Based on Regression Quantiles," Econometrica, 50, 43-61.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index