|
|  |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: RE: RE: Xtivreg2 (formerly: Two way Fixed Effects & Autocorrelation& Heteroskedasticity)
|
From |
"Schaffer, Mark E" <[email protected]> |
|
To |
<[email protected]> |
|
Subject |
st: RE: RE: Xtivreg2 (formerly: Two way Fixed Effects & Autocorrelation& Heteroskedasticity) |
|
Date |
Mon, 3 Apr 2006 12:21:35 +0100 |
Indeed ... detective work can be fun, but not always. :)
Send the exact command you used and I'll see if I can work out what
happened from that.
--Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox
> Sent: 03 April 2006 12:00
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: RE: Xtivreg2 (formerly: Two way Fixed Effects &
> Autocorrelation& Heteroskedasticity)
>
> Please edit emails. I removed several previous emails from
> this, the whole thread it seems.
>
> Please show the experts
>
> !!! exactly what you typed !!!
>
> Nick
> [email protected]
>
> [email protected]
>
> > >Thank you again,Mark.
> > I used xtrivreg2 and omitted (varlist2=varlist_iv) to
> estimate simple
> > fixed effect.I clustered on regions.Unfortunately I
> received the error
> > message:
> > number of clusters must be greater than number of
> instruments.(using
> > Stata
> > 8.2.)
> > Any suggestions whats wrong ?
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
