Yes, you can use -gllamm- for CFA, see
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2003-04/msg00334.html. But I
don't find this to be easy.
Anders Alexandersson
[email protected]
On 12/14/05, Raphael Fraser <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Can Stata 9 handle Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)? Please bear in
> mind that CFA is the opposite of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)
> which I suspect is the command -factor-.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
