Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: f-test after -qreg- or -bsqreg-


From   Maarten buis <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   RE: st: f-test after -qreg- or -bsqreg-
Date   Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:50:00 +0000 (GMT)

Dear M. Haider Hussain,

Using the F-test in this way is probably not correct. But you could do a Wald test for joint
significance. Just use the -test- command after the -bsqreg-.

HTH,
Maarten

-----------------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Department of Social Research Methodology
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Boelelaan 1081
1081 HV Amsterdam
The Netherlands

visiting adress:
Buitenveldertselaan 3 (Metropolitan), room Z214

+31 20 5986715

http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
-----------------------------------------

> After running bootstrapped quantile regression with k=15, 
> n=5401, I obtained Pseudo R2=0.3161. If I want to compute the 
> joint significance of the regressors, can I still use the 
> F-test given by
> 
> F=[r2/(k-1)]/[(1-r2)/(n-k)]
> 
> If this isn't the case, what's the measure of joint 
> significance of the regressors after -qreg- / -bsqreg-?


		
___________________________________________________________ 
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index