----- Forwarded by Amadou Bassirou Diallo/Person/World Bank on 09/07/2005 10:46
AM -----
Amadou Bassirou
Diallo To: [email protected]
cc:
09/04/2005 09:49 Subject: Re: st: is reoprob the right command?
PM
net search Chamberlain
returns no matches.
Maybe nobody writes the code
down, which opens you the door
to go on.
A starting point will be to look
at the code for reoprob and go from
there.
Best regards.
Amadou.
[email protected] wrote: -----
To: <[email protected]>
From: "Ngo,PT" <[email protected]>
Sent by: [email protected]
Date: 09/04/2005 06:23PM
Subject: st: is reoprob the right command?
Dear Statalist,
Does someone know whether there is a Stata command to estimate a Chamberlain's
random effects ordered probit model, which allows for some dependence between
the unobserved effects and the regressors by specifying a conditional normal
distribution with linear expectations and constant variance?
Is "reoprob" the right command or does it estimate a traditional random effects
probit model which assumes _independence_ between the unobserved effects and the
regressors?
Thanks a lot for your help,
Thi Minh
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
