[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Kit Baum <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected] |

Subject |
st: re: fixed effects estimation with time invariant variables |

Date |
Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:34:41 -0400 |

Alice said

I reporduce

a Hausman test (fixed vs. random effect) result. How do I interpret this

result?

hausman fixed random

---- Coefficients ----

| (b) (B) (b-B)

sqrt(diag(V_b-V_B))

| fixed random Difference S.E.

------------- +----------------------------------------------------------------

beta | .0227671 .0407022 -.0179352 .023357

------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------

b = consistent under Ho and Ha; obtained from

xtreg

B = inconsistent under Ha, efficient under Ho; obtained from

xtreg

Test: Ho: difference in coefficients not systematic

chi2(1) = (b-B)'[(V_b-V_B)^(-1)](b-B)

= 0.59

Prob>chi2 = 0.4426

In this case the common coefficient, beta, does not differ significantly between FE and RE. The Hausman test is based on the notion that the norm of the vector of differences between the common coefficients is small. In a single-coefficient case, that merely refers to the single difference -0.0179. That number is very large relative to FE or RE point estimates, but its standard error is even larger. You thus do not reject Ho: orthogonality of X and u, RE is the more efficient estimator since your Chi-square is not large enough.

Kit Baum, Boston College Economics

http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Variable number of matrixes as arguments** - Next by Date:
**st: Re: memory for matrices** - Previous by thread:
**st: Missing log likelihood** - Next by thread:
**st: Re: memory for matrices** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |