Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: RE: Transforming regressors prior to estimation in count models


From   "Carter Ivan Rees" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   RE: st: RE: Transforming regressors prior to estimation in count models
Date   Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:39:40 -0600

Bob,

Sounds to me like you would take the approach you mentioned and I would
concur with Richard.

Effectively I am not much help.

Carter

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 2:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: RE: Transforming regressors prior to estimation in
count models

Carter and Richard,
 
Let me clarify that they were estimating count models (not OLS), and
that a  
rationale for why they started with transformed variables was not given

(theoretical or otherwise).
 
Bob
 
In a message dated 6/7/2005 4:24:57 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:
Bob,

Was their model also a count model or did  they transform to meet the
normality assumption of  OLS?

Carter
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
----------------------
 
In a message dated 6/7/2005 4:19:56 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])
writes:

First off, I'm not aware of anything "special" about count models when
it  
comes to transformations of the regressors, e.g. I don't know why your  
strategy would inherently be different for count models than, say, for  
OLS.  But, there are lots of things I am not aware of, so maybe
somebody 
can offer more insights on this.
 
In general, it seems to me that variable transformations are driven by  
theoretical and/or empirical concerns.  Theory might argue that you
should 
take logs, squares or whatever; and if theory is ambivalent or silent
then 
observed empirical relationships may guide the choice.
 
If you are in the theory is silent category - then I would probably
proceed  
as you say.  There are all sorts of ways to transform variables, so I
don't 
think I would try them all out just to see what happens.  But, if  you
are 
replicating someone else's work, they may have had good reasons for
doing 
what they did, so theory may not be silent here.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]  [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 1:44 PM
To:  [email protected]
Subject: st: Transforming regressors prior to  estimation in count
models

Dear All,

I'm about to embark on  an  analysis using count models to replicate a
study 
in which the  authors log  transformed or used some other transformation
on 
their  regressors prior to  estimating their models. I was under the
impression  
that typically one begins  with untransformed variables in count
models,
assess 
the fit, and then -- if  necessary -- transforms  regressors. 

Any thoughts on these  approaches?

Thanks in  advance.

Bob Kaminski

Department of  Criminology and Criminal  Justice
Currell College
University of South   Carolina
[email protected]
(803) 777-1560   

*
*   For searches and help try:
*    http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*    http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*    http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches  and help try:
*    http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*    http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*    http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
 
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index