Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Inverse hyperbolic sine function

From   [email protected]
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: Inverse hyperbolic sine function
Date   Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:00:18 -0600


I am not sure.  Papers I have read that use this transformation refer to:

Burbidge, John B., Lonnie Magee, and A. Leslie Robb, 1988 "Alternative Transformations
Handle Extreme Values of the Dependent Variable" Journal of the American
Statistical Association, 83(401).

but I do not have access to this journal, so I am not sure how the optimal theta is

However, as z becomes large, ln(theta*z + sqrt(theta^2 * z^2 +1 )) is approximately
 equal to ln(2*theta) + ln(z), which a simply a shift in the logarithm 
(Pence, Karen M., "401(k)s and Household Saving: New Evidence from the Survey of 
Consumer Finances," FEDS Working Paper 2002-06, January 2002. ).


----- Original Message -----
From: Ricardo Ovaldia <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:22 am
Subject: Re: st: Inverse hyperbolic sine function

> --- [email protected] wrote:
> > 1.  Yes, but more generally, the ihs fuctions is
> > ln(theta*z + sqrt((theta^2 * z^2
> >  + 1))/theta; where theta is scale parameter that
> > could be estimated.
> Is IHS = log(z + sqrt(z^2 + 1)) then only an
> approximation? If so, I assume that it is good when z
> is large relative to 1/theta. But how can we know
> ahead of time how good the approximation will be on
> our data?
> Regards,
> Ricardo.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index