[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Richard. Williams" <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected] |

Subject |
Re: st: 'Rolling' Slope Dummy |

Date |
Fri, 04 Mar 2005 13:16:21 -0500 |

At 12:20 PM 3/4/2005, Robert Gaskell wrote:

When working with interaction terms, you generally want to be including the lower-order terms used to compute the interactions. e.g.All, I am looking at the relationship between two variables, and am trying to determine the effect that a third variable has on the coefficient of this relationship. Is it possible to use a sort of 'rolling' dummy (this is I am sure a completely inaccurate name), whereby instead of having a standard dummy: gen dummy = [some expression] gen var2dummy = var2*dummy reg var1 var2 var2dummy

reg var1 var2 dummy var2dummy

Otherwise you'll find that arbitrary changes in the zero point of var2 change your results (e.g. you'll get different results if your scale ranges from -3 to 3 than if it runs from 1 to 7). To see this, subtract a constant from var2 first and then re-run your above commands. To put it another way, if you are going to let the slopes differ across groups, you generally want to let the intercepts differ too.

Discussions of using interaction effects for group comparisons can be found at

http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam/stats2/l51.pdf

http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam/stats2/l52.pdf

Again, you probably want...which only has a true/false which isn't suitable here, I multiply var2 and var3 to create some sort of pseudo-rolling-slope-dummy: gen var2var3 = var2*var3 reg var1 var2 var2var3 Here, I would take the interpritation to be that for every unit increase in var3, the coefficient on var2 increases by the coefficient on var2var3.

reg var1 var2 var3 var2var3

If I understand you correctly, you are talking about interactions involving two continuous variables. These can get a little confusing to interpret. My own attempt to make sense of them can be found at

http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam/stats2/l55.pdf

The sources cited (or any source that discusses interaction terms at length) may be worth reading if you need a bit more depth than these brief notes provide.

Richard Williams, Associate Professor

OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463

FAX: (574)288-4373

HOME: (574)289-5227

EMAIL: [email protected]

WWW (personal): http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam

WWW (department): http://www.nd.edu/~soc

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: 'Rolling' Slope Dummy***From:*Robert Gaskell <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Programming question** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: Programming question** - Previous by thread:
**st: 'Rolling' Slope Dummy** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: 'Rolling' Slope Dummy** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |