Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: xttobit and xtprobit missing standard errors

From   "Guillaume Frechette" <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   RE: st: xttobit and xtprobit missing standard errors
Date   Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:28:11 +0000

You could try superxt ( or just try different starting values or different number of quadrature points.


From: "Alejandro Lopez-Feldman" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: xttobit and xtprobit missing standard errors
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:33:58 -0800 (PST)

Hi Stata users,

I am using xtprobit and xttobit to estimate a couple of models with random
effects but there seems to be a problem with my results.  When I run the
xtprobit command everything seems to be fine (no warning messages,
convergence achieved after 5 iterations and many significant coefficients)
but no standard errors are estimated for lnsig2u and therefore none s.e.
for sigma and rho, although the likelihood ratio test for rho= appears
(Prob >= chibar2 = 0.029) . I have a similar problem when I run xttobit, I
get s.e for sigma_e but not for sigma_u and therefore none for rho.

It seems to me that stata is trying to tell me that there is something
wrong with my results but I don't know how bad the problem is. Are my
estimates valid at all? Are the s.e for the coefficients meaningfull? Is
there a way to get around this problem? I am interested in getting s.e for
rho in both cases because in both cases I want to test the hypothesis that
the panel estimator isn't different from the pooled estimator.

*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index