I must precise my question. The problems does not appear in the Stata output (where stars are not displayed) but in the outreg command.
After a linear regression ('regress' command), I type:
outreg using results, replace
without any other precision.
One of the t values of the regression coefficients is 2.02 (I have it in the Stata output).
In the excel file obtained through outreg, this coefficient is not marked with a star (whereas all other significant coefficients are automatically marked with one (0.05 level) or two stars (0.01 level).
Is then a problem with outreg? Or do I misuse outreg?
Best regards and thanks again
Herv�
***********************************************************
HEC Paris
D�partement Comptabilit�-Contr�le de gestion / Dept of Accounting and Management Control
1, rue de la Liberation
78351 - Jouy-en-Josas
France
Tel: +33 1 39 67 94 42
Fax: +33 1 39 67 70 86
[email protected]
http://campus.hec.fr/profs/stolowy/perso/home.htm
>>> [email protected] 04/11/04 13:03 >>>
Please specify which program and give an example.
Nick
[email protected]
Herve STOLOWY
> I noticed a strange thing concerning the t values of the
> regression coefficients.
>
> A star should be displayed if the coefficient is significant
> at the 0.05 level. In my mind, the threshold t value for this
> level was 1.96. I have a coefficient of 2.02 in a regression
> and no star is displayed. Am I wrong somewhere? Is there a bug?
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
