Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Top ten tricks [was: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Using postfile]


From   Richard Williams <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: Top ten tricks [was: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Using postfile]
Date   Fri, 21 May 2004 08:33:14 -0500

At 02:01 PM 5/21/2004 +0100, Nick Cox wrote:
That leads to me to ask a question: which would
we nominate as (say) the top ten tricks which
are the deepest and most Stataish features
in what we use? What is _both_ simple _and_ deep?
What leads to great results with at most a few
lines of code?
I very much like -predict-. I especially like that it can be run on something other than the estimation sample. Indeed, I sometimes temporarily wipe out the "real" data, type in some hypothetical values, run -predict-, and then restore the original data. This can be quite useful for making things like logistic regression more tangible, where it is hard to see what impact variables actually have. I also like -adjust- for similar reasons.

To do the equivalent in SPSS, I sometimes have to run the regression, and then type up a compute command based on the results. Much more awkward.

I don't know if it should be considered a "trick", but I like the programmability of Stata compared to SPSS.

Common to all of the above is the way Stata stores results in memory, again something you won't see in SPSS.


-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
FAX: (574)288-4373
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW (personal): http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
WWW (department): http://www.nd.edu/~soc

*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/




© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index