Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: metan command & binary variables

From   Leonelo Bautista <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: RE: metan command & binary variables
Date   Wed, 21 Apr 2004 07:45:29 -0500

Odds ratios and relative risks are calculated different.
(4/5)/(4/51)=10.2 this is the ratio of two odds
(4/(5+4))/(4/(51+4))=6.1 this is the ratio of two probabilities (risks)

Leonelo E. Bautista, 
University of Wisconsin 
Population Health Sciences

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 5:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: metan command & binary variables

Hello All --
I'm using Stata version 8.2 and I hope someone can clarify a 
question I have regarding the -metan- command and it's 
estimation of odds ratios versus risk ratios.  Suppose I have 
two rates that capture success on a diet where the first rate 
represents those who adhered to a certain protocol and the 
second rate represents those who dropped from the protocol 
after follow-up.  Each rate is captured by the number 
successful divided by the number in the respective group 
(adhere vs follow-up).  I created four variables:  num1, den1, 
num2, & den2 where num1 is the # of successful dieters that 
adhered & den1 is the # of adherers; a similar interpretation 
follows for num2 & den2.  When I run the following code

-metan num1 den1 num2 den2, random or label(namevar=Trial)-

I get an 'odds ratio' that works out to equal the ratio of the 
rate from the adherers over the rate for the droppers.  If I 
specify -rr- instead of -or- the results differ and I am at a 
loss as to why.  Consider the following values:
num1=4, den1=5, num2=4, den2=51    
where the calculation of (4/5)/(4/51) = 10.2, which is 
consistent with -metan..., or- but if I specify -metan..., rr- 
I get a 'risk ratio' of 6.111.  Am I not understanding the 
vernacular or can someone clue me into how the 6.111 was 

As always, your input is much appreciated!
thank you -- Clint Thompson    
*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index