[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
David Airey <david.airey@vanderbilt.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
st: logistic and logit and test |

Date |
Tue, 13 Apr 2004 18:34:12 -0500 |

I'm more used to continuous y's so this is probably a beginner's question.

"Logistic" in Stata produces an odds ratio estimate, while "logit" produces a coefficient. The standard interpretation of the odds ratio estimate is it is the number by which the odds favoring y = 1 is multiplied, with each 1-unit increase in the x variable, with any covariates held constant. The logit coefficient describes the change of the logit or log odds of y for each 1-unit change in x, with any covariates held constant. If the logit coefficient were say,

.6280264

this means that the logit or log odds of y increases ~.63 for every unit of x. Equivalently, we could say each additional unit of x multiplied the odds of y = 1 by

e^.6280264 = 1.87

All this has made me wonder whether the OR test is testing whether the OR is different from "1", whereas the test for the logit coefficient really is testing the coefficient being different from 0? Since exp(0) = 1, this suggests as much. But my question is that use of "test x" after either command produces the statement that x = 0 is the test.

Why am I confused?

-Dave

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: logistic and logit and test***From:*Richard Williams <Richard.A.Williams.5@nd.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Transpose?** - Next by Date:
**st: Diagnostic Plost for 3SLS?** - Previous by thread:
**st: Transpose?** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: logistic and logit and test** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |