Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Suggestion for -confirm var- option

From   [email protected] (William Gould, Stata)
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: Suggestion for -confirm var- option
Date   Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:24:39 -0600

Kaleb Michaud <[email protected]> writes, 

> [...] debug a program, when I realized that the -confirm var- command does
> not require the variable to be spelled out fully.
> For example, suppose you have a program that looks to see if the variable
> "car" exists.  If it doesn't, it creates or merges it in.  But, if I have a
> variable called cartoon and not car in the data:
> . confirm var car
> gives us _rc == 0 even though the var car doesn't exist and the var cartoon 
> does.  Any way that the Stata powers that be could add an "exact" option
> [...]

That's a good idea.  In the meantime, the "right" way to confirm whether 
variable "car", not abbreviated, exists is

        . confirm name car
        . confirm new var car

or, in a programming context, 

        . confirm name `possiblevar'
        . confirm new var `possiblevar'

The first statement verifies that `possiblevar' could be a variable name, that
it does not violate Stata's naming conventions.  The second line verifies that
a variable named `possiblevar' does not already exist.

-- Bill
[email protected]
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index