  # st: RE : 2SLS with quadratic RHS endogenous vars

 From "Olivier Paradis-Beland" To Subject st: RE : 2SLS with quadratic RHS endogenous vars Date Fri, 28 Nov 2003 09:19:42 -0500

```I don't think that stata can do it (I may be wrong though) buy your model could be easily estimated with SAS's nonlinear GMM procedure. Don't hesitate if you want more details.

-------- Message d'origine--------
De: Morris, Stephen [mailto:s.morris@imperial.ac.uk]
Date: ven. 2003-11-28 08:40
À: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Cc:
Objet: st: 2SLS with quadratic RHS endogenous vars

Hi,

Does anyone know of a way to run a 2SLS model in Stata where the endogenous RHS variable would ideally appear in a quadratic form?

I am using -ivreg2- to find the effect of an independent variable x on a dependent variable y, where I believe that x and y will be simultaneously determined. I have what I think are a set of non-weak, orthogonal instruments for x, namely z. So, the command I use is:

ivreg2 y q (x = z)

q is a set of exogenous variables also thought to influence y.

I have reason to believe that the true impact of x on y is non-linear, and I would ideally like to estimate a model including x and x squared. Given that x is simultaneously determined with y I am not sure how to proceed.

Option 1:

One approach would be to run –ivreg2- as normal and instrument both x and x squared. That is, to run:

ivreg2 y q (x xsquared = z)

This produces a set of results, but the sign and magnitude of the coefficients on x and x squared are counterintuitive. I think this might be because unless my first stage model is able to predict perfectly x and x squared (which it is not) I will not actually be modelling a quadratic form (i.e. the predicted value of x squared from the first stage regressions does not equal the square of the predicted value of x).

Option 2:

So, the other thing I thought to do was to estimate the first stage equation for x and compute the linear prediction (call this xhat). Then square these predictions (call this xhatsquared) and use these to measure the effects of x squared in my second stage:

reg y q xhat xhatsquared

The results appear to be more sensible, but I am not sure if the approach is valid.

Any thoughts on which option to use, if either, would be greatly appreciated. I am using Stata version 8.2. I have previously searched the FAQ and the Statalist archives, and the question I pose is similar to one posted by Jim Shaw on 18 July, but with respect to non-linear RHS endogenous variables rather than non-linear RHS exogenous variables.

Thanks very much.

Steve

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

```

<<winmail.dat>>