[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"M Parameswaran" <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected] |

Subject |
st: Bootstapping panel data |

Date |
Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:51:05 +0530 (IST) |

Dear Frinds, I am implementing a bootstrap estimation procedure using an unbalanced panel data. The data set is very large and consists of 13016 observations on 1096 firms for 12 years. In the bootstrap procedure I used cluster (block) bootstrapping approach, i.e. treating observations on each firm as cluster and sampling among clusters, available in STATA. The number of clusters in each bootstrap sample is equal to the number of firms in the original data. However of because of the unbalanced nature of the panel data the number of observations is different in different bootstrap samples. (The difference is not large. I found that the minimum number of observations in the bootstrap samples is less than 150 of the original data and the maximum number of observations in the bootstrap samples exceeds the number of observations in original data by 152 in 300 replications.) Is the any problem in bootstrapping in this way? Firms� entry into and exit from the data set is random. If so, is there any STATA code available that can sample same number of firms and same number of observations in a bootstrap procedure? One pervious study, which used bootstrap estimation in unbalanced panel data context, (Levinsohn and Pertin, 2003, Review of Economic Studies, pp. 317-341) considers that a bootstrap sample is complete if it has same number of firms and number of observations equal to or more than that of the original data. Since, computationally it is quite difficult to fix the number of blocks and the number of observations together in a bootstrap procedure, as an alternative procedure, is there any problem in selecting only those bootstrap samples that satisfy the criteria set up by the above mentioned study and estimates parameters of interest using these samples. (In bootstrap samples around 50 per cent of the samples satisfy this criteria) Any comments on these issues would be greatly appreciated, Thanking you in advance M. Parameswaran -------------------------------------------------- Parameswaran M Centre for Development Studies, Prasanthnagar Road, Ulloor, Trivandrum 695 011, Kerala,India. Phone: 0091-0471-442481 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**st: Efficiency of -xtgee, corr(unstructured)-** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: definition of pseudo R^2 for dprobit or probit** - Previous by thread:
**st: Efficiency of -xtgee, corr(unstructured)-** - Next by thread:
**st: Intraclass correlations for 2-way ANOVA?** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |