[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Joao Pedro W. de Azevedo" <[email protected]> |

To |
<[email protected]> |

Subject |
st: RE: RE: proportion as a dependent variable |

Date |
Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:45:01 +0100 |

```
I've seen papers in which the authors used a tobit model censored at 0 and 1
to model a proportion.
Would this be an acceptable approach?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:35 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: RE: proportion as a dependent variable
Ronnie Babigumira
> I was attending a workshop in which one of the presenters
> had a regression
> in which a dependent variable was a proportion. One of the
> participants
> noted that it was wrong but didnt follow it up with a clear
> explanation.
Presumably the argument was that, given predictor x,
a linear form a + bx must predict response values outside [0,1] for
some x, so that at least in principle the functional
form cannot be appropriate. In practice, if response were (say)
proportion female and x were time, then the time at which the
proportion passed outside the interval might be far outside the
range of the data, but there are plenty of exceptions.
This is most commonly mentioned, at least in my reading,
as a simple argument why a + bx is likely to be a poor form
for predicting responses which are either 0 or 1, an
argument which usually leads to a case for logit or
probit models. But the argument seems almost as strong
for proportions. And -- historically -- logit as a
transformation for continuous responses preceded logit
as (in modern terms) a link function for binary responses.
(The terminology of logit is more recent than its use.)
Generalised linear models offer a nice approach to this
question using e.g. logit link and some sensible family.
There is a FAQ with further comments at
How does one estimate a model when the dependent variable
is a proportion? http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/logit.html
Nick
[email protected]
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
```

**Follow-Ups**:**st: RE: RE: RE: proportion as a dependent variable***From:*"Nick Cox" <[email protected]>

**References**:**st: RE: proportion as a dependent variable***From:*"Nick Cox" <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: RE: var gen based on history** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: RE: RE: proportion as a dependent variable** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: proportion as a dependent variable** - Next by thread:
**st: RE: RE: RE: proportion as a dependent variable** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |