Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: RE: summ, format

From   "SJ Friederich, Economics" <>
Subject   Re: st: RE: summ, format
Date   Mon, 07 Jul 2003 20:58:08 +0100

Gasp, I missed that thread and its (many) solutions, now more than two years old in the case of Nick's -summdate-, so thanks for your replies.

-search summarize dates, all- (or other keywords I've tried such as "elapsed", etc.) didn't retrieve anything relevant today, unfortunately.

Maybe a brief mention in the manual that the -format- option doesn't apply to %d could be useful to prevent further questions like mine to this List (and confusion for all Stata users who are not on it).

Thanks again.

--On 07 July 2003 14:34 -0500 Fred Wolfe <> wrote:

My program (available as ssc install fsum) does summarize and more and
respects the formatting in the program.

Fred Wolfe

There is, in effect, an extra rule not stated
here: date formats are ignored by -summarize-.
Why? One can only guess:

1. Perhaps the developers just thought it unlikely
that people really wanted that, or never got round
to implementing it.

2. Also, a problem with date formats is that it is not
obvious that the date format should be followed
for all statistics. I guess that a user might want
the mean, min, max etc. to be given as dates,
but not the standard deviation, but is that
correct. The variance of dates would
have rather strange units. Skewness and kurtosis
naturally have no units.

3. Another awkward problem is this: would there be
enough space in the -summarize, detail- display?

I guess 1. is the key.

-codebook- pays some attention to date formats,
as I recall.

On SSC, see -datesum-, -summdate-, perhaps others.
(The -findit- database doesn't show SSC materials
at this instant.)

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2022 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index