Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: important predictors


From   Ricardo Ovaldia <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: important predictors
Date   Fri, 3 Jan 2003 09:17:44 -0800 (PST)

I have been asked by a researcher the following. Prior
to treatment 35 patients were asked 5 yes/no questions
regarding their habits. After therapy each patients
treatment outcome was classified using a 6 value
scale. The researcher wants to know if any of the 5
questions are good predictors of treatment outcome.

I used Stata's -ologit- on each question by itself and
did not find any question to be significantly
associated with outcome at the 5% or 10% level. 

I then included all questionstios into a single
-ologit- model and got:

.                 xi:ologit global nf1-nf5

Iteration 0:   log likelihood = -43.829309
Iteration 1:   log likelihood = -38.057521
Iteration 2:   log likelihood = -37.932282
Iteration 3:   log likelihood = -37.931337
Iteration 4:   log likelihood = -37.931337

Ordered logit estimates                          
Number of obs   =         35
                                                  LR
chi2(5)      =      11.80
                                                  Prob
> chi2     =     0.0377
Log likelihood = -37.931337                      
Pseudo R2       =     0.1346

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      global |      Coef.   Std. Err.      z    P>|z| 
   [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
          q1 |   1.548668     .76917     2.01   0.044 
   .0411227    3.056214
          q2 |   .8078226    .672176     1.20   0.229 
  -.5096181    2.125263
          q3 |  -.2580387   .7716049    -0.33   0.738 
  -1.770356    1.254279
          q4 |  -1.656282   .7447833    -2.22   0.026 
  -3.116031   -.1965337
          q5 |   1.562217   .7666611     2.04   0.042 
    .059589    3.064845
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
       _cut1 |   .0145412   .7083502         
(Ancillary parameters)
       _cut2 |   1.922157   .7940725 
       _cut3 |   4.343486   1.077408 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Can I make the statement that q4 is the most important
predictor, followed by q5, q1 and so on. That is,
ranked by their corresponding p values?  
  
Thanks,
Ricardo

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index