Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: negative variance?


From   Hanne F <hannefriedl@hotmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   st: negative variance?
Date   Tue, 25 Jun 2013 04:11:03 -0700 (PDT)

Hi,

I am currently using a two-level random slope model, logistic regression.
The reason I use multilevel is to control for a possible design effect. I am
using xtmelogit, but I already tried glamm and xtlogit as well. I have data
for three measurements. When running the same model on the first two
measurements, I do not experience any problems. By contrast, for the third
measurement, I do not seem to get an accurate estimation of the second level
variance. Sd_cons is virtually zero, and the confidence interval is also
odd: I get exactly 0 as a lower point, and a '.' as upper bound. The p-value
indicating whether or not it is necessary to use a multilevel design gives
exactly zero. Can anyone tell me why this is the case?
In a multilevel course based on MLWin I learned that in this case you should
'allow for negative variance'. Can anybody please tell me how I could do
this with Stata?

thank you very much in advance!!

best regards,
Hanne



--
View this message in context: http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/negative-variance-tp7580385.html
Sent from the Statalist mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index