Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Re: Re: FW: Mediation with endogenous mediator and endogenous independent variables


From   "A.M. Aranda Gutierrez" <A.M.Aranda@uvt.nl>
To   "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: Re: Re: FW: Mediation with endogenous mediator and endogenous independent variables
Date   Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:47:14 +0000

Dear John,

Thanks again for your help. I'm sorry my message is still unclear. 
I think you already gave an answer to my question, but  just to clarify, 
Are you suggesting me to interpret the impact of the independent variables on the mediator by looking at the impact of the instruments on the mediator? 
In other words, if the instruments are strong, can I make a conclusion about the impact of the endogenous independent variables on the mediator by looking at the impact of the instruments on the mediator? 
So, is it not possible for Stata to produce an output of m = c (x1 x2 x3 = z1 z2 z3) when using the ivregress 2sls command?

Best,

Ana



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index