Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: outreg2 to latex and variable placement problem


From   Michael Tekle Palm <mickilinen@hotmail.com>
To   "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st: outreg2 to latex and variable placement problem
Date   Fri, 10 May 2013 13:49:23 +0200

Dear John!

-sortvar- worked like an absolute charm.

You have my sincerest gratitude 5 days before the thesis-deadline!

Mike

----------------------------------------
> Subject: Re: st: outreg2 to latex and variable placement problem
> From: jlgallup@pdx.edu
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 09:28:50 -0700
> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
>
> Mike,
>
> If you use the -sortvar- option, that should solve your problem:
>
> reg enrolled hh_risk_1 hh_risk_2 age sex, r
> outreg2 using enrolledreg, drop(hh_risk_2) tex(fragment) replace
> reg enrolled hh_risk_1 hh_risk_2 age sex, r
> outreg2 using enrolledreg, sortvar( hh_risk_1 hh_risk_2 age sex) tex(fragment)
>
> John
>
> On May 9, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Michael Tekle Palm <mickilinen@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello Statalist!
> >
> > I am compiling a table of two different regressions using the same dep. var. but alternate independent variables. I want these two independent variables to appear next to each other in the first column ("VARIABLES") of the outreg2 table. This is the code I'm using:
> >
> >
> >
> > *** BEGIN STATA CODE ***
> >
> >
> > reg enrolled hh_risk_1 hh_risk_2 age sex, r
> >
> > outreg2 using enrolledreg, drop(hh_risk_2) tex(fragment) replace
> >
> > reg enrolled hh_risk_1 hh_risk_2 age sex, r
> >
> > outreg2 using enrolledreg, drop(hh_risk_1) tex(fragment)
> >
> >
> > *** END STATA CODE ***
> >
> >
> > The two independent variables of interest are hh_risk_1 and hh_risk_2. Note that I am using the option drop() in each outreg2 command. What happens is that the variable that is used in the second regression only (hh_risk_2) appears at the bottom row of the table. Initially, only one of the variables was included in each regression, but I included both variables in both regressions and added the drop() option in an attempt to let the variable appear but without the results. This did not work.
> >
> > I realize it appears in the bottom because it's the last new variable that is identified by outreg2, but I'd really love if someone could help with this simple(?) problem!
> >
> >
> > To clarify, the left table is how I want it to look, and the right is what outreg2 produces:
> >
> >
> > VARIABLES VARIABLES
> > --------- ---------
> >
> > hh_risk_1 hh_risk_1
> >
> > hh_risk_2 age
> >
> > age sex
> >
> > sex hh_risk_2
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Mike
> > *
> > * For searches and help try:
> > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ 		 	   		  
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index