Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
John Luke Gallup <jlgallup@pdx.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: outreg2 to latex and variable placement problem |

Date |
Thu, 9 May 2013 09:28:50 -0700 |

Mike, If you use the -sortvar- option, that should solve your problem: reg enrolled hh_risk_1 hh_risk_2 age sex, r outreg2 using enrolledreg, drop(hh_risk_2) tex(fragment) replace reg enrolled hh_risk_1 hh_risk_2 age sex, r outreg2 using enrolledreg, sortvar( hh_risk_1 hh_risk_2 age sex) tex(fragment) John On May 9, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Michael Tekle Palm <mickilinen@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hello Statalist! > > I am compiling a table of two different regressions using the same dep. var. but alternate independent variables. I want these two independent variables to appear next to each other in the first column ("VARIABLES") of the outreg2 table. This is the code I'm using: > > > > *** BEGIN STATA CODE *** > > > reg enrolled hh_risk_1 hh_risk_2 age sex, r > > outreg2 using enrolledreg, drop(hh_risk_2) tex(fragment) replace > > reg enrolled hh_risk_1 hh_risk_2 age sex, r > > outreg2 using enrolledreg, drop(hh_risk_1) tex(fragment) > > > *** END STATA CODE *** > > > The two independent variables of interest are hh_risk_1 and hh_risk_2. Note that I am using the option drop() in each outreg2 command. What happens is that the variable that is used in the second regression only (hh_risk_2) appears at the bottom row of the table. Initially, only one of the variables was included in each regression, but I included both variables in both regressions and added the drop() option in an attempt to let the variable appear but without the results. This did not work. > > I realize it appears in the bottom because it's the last new variable that is identified by outreg2, but I'd really love if someone could help with this simple(?) problem! > > > To clarify, the left table is how I want it to look, and the right is what outreg2 produces: > > > VARIABLES VARIABLES > --------- --------- > > hh_risk_1 hh_risk_1 > > hh_risk_2 age > > age sex > > sex hh_risk_2 > > > > Regards, > > Mike > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: outreg2 to latex and variable placement problem***From:*Michael Tekle Palm <mickilinen@hotmail.com>

**References**:**st: outreg2 to latex and variable placement problem***From:*Michael Tekle Palm <mickilinen@hotmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: asclogit alternative has replicate levels for one or more cases** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: complicated twoway graph** - Previous by thread:
**st: outreg2 to latex and variable placement problem** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: outreg2 to latex and variable placement problem** - Index(es):