Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: confusion


From   montaha <muntahakhader@hotmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   st: confusion
Date   Sat, 4 May 2013 08:25:26 -0700 (PDT)

hello everybody,
i need your help guys 
i had to test for fixed and random effects using STATA.
I got the following tables which shows that 
In "fixed effects" output the signs of the coefficient are totally different
from anticipated signs in theory, additionally some of them are
insignificant.
But in Random effect output the signs are true and they are significant.
when i did Hausman test.. the prob>chi2 was 0.000 which indicates that i
shall use Fixed effect
but as i have mentioned the signs are not as expected and they are not
significant...
the output

<http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/file/n7580362/1_1.png>  
<http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/file/n7580362/2_2.png> 
<http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/file/n7580362/3_3.png> 

thank u i advance 



--
View this message in context: http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/confusion-tp7580362.html
Sent from the Statalist mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index