Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Re: z-score diff plots
Nick Cox <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Re: st: Re: z-score diff plots
Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:18:24 +0100
I am not a statistician either. I'd encourage you to use your clincal
experience to evaluate what makes sense.
-pairplot- (SSC) appears to include this kind of plot.
On 11 April 2013 16:13, Nikos Kakouros <email@example.com> wrote:
> Dear Prof Cox,
> Thank you for your reply.
> Although the tests are meant to measure the same factor they do so
> differently and hence with vary different resultant values. This is
> why I standardized into z-scores and then plotted the difference
> between the matched z-scores against the third variable.
> I think it worked as I can see a pattern as expected from the below:
> a) The first test appears to be dependent on the third variable
> linearly (lower results, I think artifactual, with higher levels of
> the third variable).
> b) The second test values appear flat when plotted against the third
> varilable (i.e the results from this test do not appear to be
> affected by this variable).
> c) The difference in z-scores between the two tests does have a
> significant slope (p<0.005) when plotted against the third variable.
> I take this to suggest that there is a significant difference in the
> way the two tests interact with the variable (else their z-scores
> should cancel out and produce a horizontal plot along the 0 line). I
> guess this is effectively showing that there is a significant
> difference in their respective regression line coefficients against
> the third variable but in a graphical way.
> Does this make sense? I appreciate this is not directly a Stata
> question but I'm a clinician with limited statistics experience and
> have never come across a similar plot and neither have I found it
> mentioned anywhere. I think that (if valid) it should be helpful...
> (maybe this could be the start of a new Stata command :)
> I would be grateful for your comments.
> Many thanks again,
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Nick Cox <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Plotting difference against mean is a standard plot for many people.
>> It is a relative of the principle that it is helpful to plot residual
>> against fitted.
>> Plotting some difference against a third variable might similarly be
>> useful. It is a bit like the standard practice of plotting residuals
>> from some model against a predictor not in the model.
>> The question is does it work, that is, can you see a pattern?
>> There are some general references in
>> SJ-4-3 gr0005 . . . . . Speaking Stata: Graphing agreement and disagreement
>> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N. J. Cox
>> Q3/04 SJ 4(3):329--349 (no commands)
>> how to select the right graph to portray comparison or
>> assessment of agreement or disagreement between data
>> measured on identical scales
>> .pdf accessible via http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=gr0005
>> On 11 April 2013 15:24, Nikos Kakouros <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks, Joseph.
>>> I was hoping to have a single graph demonstrating the interaction
>>> between the three variables.
>>> I wonder what anyone thought of the proposed idea of plotting the
>>> z-score difference between the two tests against the interacting
>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Joseph Coveney <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>>> Nikos Kakouros wrote:
>>>> I'd like to first apologize upfront for the lack of specificity in my
>>>> question - please be sensitive to my lack of experience with Stata. :)
>>>> I have two tests that are meant to measure the same thing (blood
>>>> thickness) but with totally different units. On the whole they
>>>> correlate well (patients with thick blood have higher values on both
>>>> measurements), but the first test is affected (on univariate analysis)
>>>> by another blood parameter but the second test is not. Their
>>>> correlation is, therefore, dependent on the third parameter.
>>>> I would appreciate on comments/advice on how to best visually show
>>>> this relationship in Stata. I was thinking the following: convert all
>>>> measurements to z-scores and depict the difference in z-score for the
>>>> two measurements at different values (y axis) vs the value of the
>>>> third variable that affects one of the tests more than the other
>>>> Is anyone familiar with such a visualization?
>>>> I'm not familiar with it. Would a scatterplot matrix (SPLOM) help?
>>>> (See -help graph matrix-.)
>>>> Joseph Coveney
>>>> * For searches and help try:
>>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>> * For searches and help try:
>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
* For searches and help try: