Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: A layman question on model building


From   John Antonakis <John.Antonakis@unil.ch>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: A layman question on model building
Date   Fri, 08 Mar 2013 08:30:39 +0100

Sorry....a small clarification (based on off of-line question I got). By "eq. 2-5c", I meant to say, see Equations 2-5c, which show that consistency is not harmed by including an omitted nonsignificant regressor.

Best,
J.

__________________________________________

John Antonakis
Professor of Organizational Behavior
Director, Ph.D. Program in Management

Faculty of Business and Economics
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis

Associate Editor
The Leadership Quarterly
__________________________________________

On 07.03.2013 08:22, John Antonakis wrote:
Hi:

If you have a sufficiently large sample size and the regressors of interest are significant predictors, then it is best to leave in the controls; they do not harm but help consistency (even if only a tad). What suffers is efficiency (standard errors) and this is amplified in small sample size conditions. I would (mostly) always err on the side of caution and include the controls. A couple of things to do before considering dropping are: (a) to do a Wald test to test whether the controls are simultaneously different from zero; (b) to do a Hausman test comparing the consistent and efficient estimator or a Chow test for the common regressors. See the first series of discussions (eq. 2-5c to see that consistency is never harmed even if a omitted regressor is not a significant predictor: Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. 2010. On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6): 1086-1120. http://www.hec.unil.ch/jantonakis/Causal_Claims.pdf

Best,
J.

__________________________________________

John Antonakis
Professor of Organizational Behavior
Director, Ph.D. Program in Management

Faculty of Business and Economics
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis

Associate Editor
The Leadership Quarterly
__________________________________________

On 07.03.2013 08:07, James Bernard wrote:
Hi all,

I have a question which may sound too basic, but I wonder if anyone could help:

We often add control variables that turn out to be insignificant. Does
that mean that I can remove that variable form my model without being
concerned with omitted variable bias?

Thanks,
James
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index