Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <jvverkuilen@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Ologit question |

Date |
Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:56:20 -0400 |

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Anat (Manes) Tchetchik <anatmanes@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear statalist, > > Sorry for the probably trivial question > I ran an Ologit and received the following cutoffs: > > Coef. Std. Err. 95% > Conf. Interval] > /cut1 | -1.798009 2.900799 -7.483471 3.887453 > /cut2 | .7973023 2.793147 -4.677166 6.271771 > /cut3 | 2.902347 2.794626 -2.57502 8.379713 > which means that the cutoffs are not significantly different. > Does it mean that the entire model is worthless? Before you jump to any conclusions about the machine not working make sure that the cord's plugged in. Did you forget a weighting term or did listwise deletion dump most of your cases? Standard errors of these cutoffs should be proportional to 1/sqrt(n) and these are huge. Usually what happens with a crappy model is that the terms end up not separated, but that's not what you have here. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Ologit question***From:*"Anat (Manes) Tchetchik" <anatmanes@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: Ologit question***From:*"Anat (Manes) Tchetchik" <anatmanes@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Ologit question** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Ologit question** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Ologit question** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Ologit question** - Index(es):