Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: coefficient interpretation in OLS

From   "Lynn Lee" <>
To   <>
Subject   RE: st: coefficient interpretation in OLS
Date   Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:37:34 -0700

Dear David,

I appreciate your suggestion about IMS Bulletin regarding this
interpretation issue. The two points are much more informative and detailed
than what I learned from textbook. 

Best Regards,
Lynn Lee

-----Original Message-----
[] On Behalf Of David Hoaglin
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: st: coefficient interpretation in OLS

Dear Lynn,

In interpreting the coefficients in a multiple regression, two facts
are important.

1. The definition of each coefficient includes the set of other
predictors in the model.

2. The coefficient of a predictor, say X1, tells how Y changes in
response to change in X1 after adjusting for the contributions of the
other predictors in the model (in the data at hand).  A coefficient is
a slope, so it gives change in Y per unit increase in X1, not
necessarily the change in Y when X1 is increased by 1 unit (unless the
values of X1 are only 0 and 1).  Some textbooks, unfortunately,
interpret the coefficient of X1 as telling how Y changes with an
increase of 1 unit in X1 when the other predictors are held fixed, but
that is simply not how OLS works; that interpretation is
oversimplified and often incorrect.

Terry Speed's column in the current issue of the IMS Bulletin
discusses both of these points.

David Hoaglin

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Lynn Lee <> wrote:
> Dear all,
> When I run simple OLS regression or pooled OLS regression, I find if I add
> more variables to the model, the coefficient on specific explanatory
> variable can vary in magnitude. For example,
> Y1=beta+beta1*X1+beta2*X2+beta3*X3+error term;
> Y2=alpha+alpha1*X1+ alpha2*X2+ alpha3*X3+ alpha4*X4+error term.
> The absolute value of estimates of beta1 or alpha1 can increase or
> decrease.  I am not confident to explain this theoretically. Is it related
> to potential endogeneity issue?
> Best Regards,
> Lynn Lee
*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index