Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Richard Williams <richardwilliams.ndu@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu, statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: margins dydx for logit model with interaction terms |

Date |
Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:50:03 -0500 |

At 03:32 PM 8/9/2012, David Quinn wrote:

Thanks, Richard. I did not use factor variable notation. Hence, that's why I also set the interactions at specific values in the margins command. Is there a reason to use the factor notation instead?

Yes. You want to get the correct results. ;-) See http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam/stats/Margins01.pdf

I think that Stata is interpreting the "atmeans" part of the margins command as setting all variables at their means, including the variable of interest (the one placed in parentheses after dydx). Perhaps what I need to do is remove the "atmeans" part, and instead include the control variable (X4) in the -at- specification and set it at its mean value. --Dave On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Richard Williams <richardwilliams.ndu@gmail.com> wrote: > At 11:30 AM 8/9/2012, David Quinn wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I am estimating a logit model as such: Y=X1 + X2 + X3 + X4 + X1*X3 + >> X2*X3. > > > What was the actual logit command? Did you use factor variable notation? If > not -margins- will assume x1 and x2 are continuous rather than dichotomous.> Assuming you want to treat x3 as continuous, The command shouldbe something> like > > logit y i.x1 i.x2 x3 x4 i.x1#c.x3 i.x2#c.x3 > > > >> X1 and X2 are binary predictors. X3 is an ordinal predictor. X4 is a >> control variable. X1*X3 and X2*X3 are the interaction of X1 and X2, >> respectively, with X3. >> >> I'd like to assess the discrete change in my dependent variable for X1 >> at different levels of X3, given that I expect there to be interaction >> effects of X1 and X3. I also need to set X2 and X2*X3 at zero while >> doing this in order to calculate the proper discrete change of >> interest. As for the control variable X4, I'd like to just keep it at >> its mean value. >> >> I used the following margins command to calculate the discrete change in >> X1: >> >> margins, dydx(X1) atmeans at(X3=(1 2 3) X1*X3=(1 2 3) X2=0 X2*X3=0) > > > if you have used factor variable notation, I think all you need is > > margins, dydx(x1) atmeans at(x3=1 2 3) x2 = 0) > > I could be wrong so make sure it looks right. > > > >> "Atmeans" places X4 at its mean, while the stuff after "at" specifies >> the specific values at which to hold the other variables while >> calculating the change. >> >> But in the legend that accompanies the results, it keeps saying that >> X1 is being held at its mean value when the discrete change >> calculations are being made. Why does margins set the variable of >> interest--located after the dydx command--to its mean value when >> calculating the discrete change, when clearly one would want the dydx >> calculations to be made at specific values of the variable of >> interest? I just assumed that placing the variable of interest after >> dydx would tell Stata to calculate the change in Y as that variable >> moves from zero to one, holding all other variables at the values >> specified after "at." >> >> Am I doing something incorrectly? >> >> Perhaps I should just use King et al.'s CLARIFY package to calculate >> the predicted probabilities, or perhaps even follow Buis' (2010) >> advice and calculate the odds. From what I gather, those two are a >> bit more straightforward then using the margins command. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> --Dave >> * >> * For searches and help try: >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > > ------------------------------------------- > Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology > OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463 > HOME: (574)289-5227 > EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu > WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

------------------------------------------- Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463 HOME: (574)289-5227 EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: margins dydx for logit model with interaction terms***From:*David Quinn <dxquinnx@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: margins dydx for logit model with interaction terms***From:*David Quinn <dxquinnx@gmail.com>

**Re: st: margins dydx for logit model with interaction terms***From:*Richard Williams <richardwilliams.ndu@gmail.com>

**Re: st: margins dydx for logit model with interaction terms***From:*David Quinn <dxquinnx@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: margins dydx for logit model with interaction terms** - Next by Date:
**st: mac crash fix?** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: margins dydx for logit model with interaction terms** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: margins dydx for logit model with interaction terms** - Index(es):