Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: Observations not used


From   "David Radwin" <dradwin@mprinc.com>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: Observations not used
Date   Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:06:41 -0700 (PDT)

Ari,

Please try this:

. list if !e(sample)

David
--
David Radwin
Senior Research Associate
MPR Associates, Inc.
2150 Shattuck Ave., Suite 800
Berkeley, CA 94704
Phone: 510-849-4942
Fax: 510-849-0794

www.mprinc.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-
> statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Ari Dothan
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 11:52 AM
> To: statalist
> Subject: st: Observations not used
> 
> Hello all,
> Regression results provide information concerning the number of
> observations which were not used.
> Question: In a multiple regression- how do I know which observations
> were not used? There is missing data in all vars employed.
> The Cox 2002 article in the Stata Journal (2) clarifies, to some
> extent, the issue in the case of a univariate regression, linking it
> to singleton groups. I cannot find, however, what rule is applied in
> the case of multiple vars.
> Thanks
> 
> --
> Ari Dothan
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index