Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: zero-inflated negative binomial option for heckman in GLLAMM


From   Lisa Marie Yarnell <lisayarnell@yahoo.com>
To   "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: zero-inflated negative binomial option for heckman in GLLAMM
Date   Thu, 12 Jul 2012 10:55:17 -0700 (PDT)

Hi all,

I know that a heckman model can be run in gllamm, and a Poisson distribution can be declared for the "y" dependent variable.  I'd actually prefer zero inflated negative binomial, though.

Is a zero-inflated option available for the final second-stage y for a heckman in gllamm?  How would I declare this with the link and family options?

Thanks!
Lisa

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index