Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: St: z transformation - mibeta command


From   "Hoang Dinh Quoc" <hoangdquoc@gmail.com>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st: St: z transformation - mibeta command
Date   Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:30:17 +0700

Thanks Maarten,

I just want to run for z transformation and it suggests mibeta command can
work. Maybe other command produces z transformation?

Best,
Quoc

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Maarten Buis
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 3:02 PM
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: st: St: z transformation - mibeta command

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Hoang Dinh Quoc wrote:
> It does not work with other mi estimates such as mi estimate: reg y x1 x2
> x3... and it reports the same 'no imputations'.
>
> I have no missing values in my dataset. Can this be the problem?

Why do you want to use multiple imputation if you do not have missing
values?

-- Maarten

--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany


http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index