Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
John Antonakis <John.Antonakis@unil.ch> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Regression with about 5000 (dummy) variables |

Date |
Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:06:17 +0200 |

OK; I did call it a trick, didn't I? :-)

Best, J. __________________________________________ Prof. John Antonakis Faculty of Business and Economics Department of Organizational Behavior University of Lausanne Internef #618 CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny Switzerland Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438 Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305 http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis Associate Editor The Leadership Quarterly __________________________________________ On 20.04.2012 15:33, Christopher Baum wrote:

<> On Apr 20, 2012, at 2:33 AM, John wrote:The estimator still seems good. Notice, though, that the F-test numerator DFs are only 3. So that's what I meant when I said we save on DF (as compared to the OLS fixed-effects estimator).You're cheating, John, by overlooking that theorem about the absence of a free lunch. The number of DF is not 3. When you gave the commands bys idcode : egen double cl_age_id = mean(age) bys south : egen double cl_age_south = mean(age) you computed a large number of sample means, so the cluster-mean regressors in the Mundlak model must be considered as not single DF, but as many DF as it took to compute them, following the logic of the FE model. I could make the same mistake by applying the within transformation to Y and X and running OLS, which would have one DF for the one slope estimated. But if I used the FE estimator it would properly account for the fact that the within transformation is not free, as this is just the LSDV (dummy-variable) model, and putting in all those dummies is not free. Neither is this method. Your DF should be adjusted to reflect the creation of those cl_* variables. Kit Kit Baum | Boston College Economics& DIW Berlin | http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html An Introduction to Stata Programming | http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata | http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**Re: Re: st: Regression with about 5000 (dummy) variables***From:*Christopher Baum <kit.baum@bc.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Re: st: Regression with about 5000 (dummy) variables** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: merging two datasets of long format** - Previous by thread:
**Re: Re: st: Regression with about 5000 (dummy) variables** - Next by thread:
**st: Study design question; MLB; pay and performance.** - Index(es):