Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: find categorical variables |

Date |
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:27:16 +0000 |

The assumption is fallacious. As one of many counter-examples, consider a variable that is 50% 0s and 50% 1s. The mean would be 0.5. The same example shows that the median of integers need not be integer either; while the mode of integers must be integer, the mode is not always well defined, at least with the usual naive definitions of mode. In any case the converse does not follow for any of these measures, i.e. an integer-valued summary implies very little of consequence. The problem is related to that in a concurrent thread, started by Bert Jung in http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2012-03/msg00731.html and with no closure yet, on distinguishing binary from continuous variables. The discussion in that thread is broken, so use e.g. http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2012-03/ as a catalogue of contributions. Stata clearly has no precise notion of categorical variables; it has a precise notion of factor variables, but nothing makes the use of factor variables compulsory for what any researcher might call categorical variables. Categoricity, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. So, you need a definition, and whatever definition you use will not be fail-safe, but it is easy enough to find all variables that are integer-valued. With -findname- (SSC, SJ) you can do this findname, all(@ == int(@)) (-floor()- or -ceil()- would work fine instead of -int()-). The criterion for an integer used here is that it rounds to itself. I also posted yesterday a signal that -distinct- (SSC) has just been updated in a way that makes it more useful in this territory. http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2012-03/msg00893.html -distinct- lets you find the number of distinct values. I know that many users work with categorical variables with many, many categories, so that need not be part of your criterion. As in the thread cited above, note also the possibility that categorical variables are held in string form. Nick On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Jakob Petersen <jpeterb@essex.ac.uk> wrote: > Looking for a way to distinguish categorical from other types of variables. > The following code is based on the assumption that the mean of a variable of > all integers would be an integer, but _rc seems to take the value 7 here > regardless - any ideas? Many thanks in advance. > > ** finding categorical variables ****** > sysuse auto,clear > local catvarlist > foreach v of var * { > qui su `v',mean > cap confirm integer number `r(mean)' > if _rc==0 { > local catvarlist `catvarlist' `v' > } > } > di "`catvarlist'" > *************************************** > *adapted from: http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=dm0048 > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: find categorical variables***From:*Jakob Petersen <jpeterb@essex.ac.uk>

**References**:**st: find categorical variables***From:*Jakob Petersen <jpeterb@essex.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**st: marginal effects after multinomial logits** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: find categorical variables** - Previous by thread:
**st: find categorical variables** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: find categorical variables** - Index(es):