Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: MIXLOGIT: marginal effects |

Date |
Tue, 7 Feb 2012 11:49:08 +0100 |

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Richard Williams wrote: > I think knowing the mean of a variable is useful, e.g. is the mean income > $30K or is it $60K? Likewise I think knowing the AME (Average Marginal > Effect) is useful, e.g. is the average difference between blacks and whites > 5% or is it 50%? In neither case do I think the number tells you everything > you could want to know but it tells you something. The difference between the mean and AME is that the former a model of the data while the latter is a model of a model. A model is a simplification of reality and the aim for that simplification is to get interpretable results. In that sense I have no problem to use the mean to summarize the data. On the other hand if one needs an additional model (marginal effects) to understand an initial model (a non-linear model like -logit-), than the initial model is not simple enough. The way to solve such problems is to choose a model that does what you want instead of adding a post-hoc fix to an inadequate model. I don't think that there is no use for AMEs whatsoever, the problem I have is with studies that only report or discuss AMEs. In essence that is just an unnecessarily complex way of estimating a linear probability model, and per Occam's razor, the simple linear regression model should be preferred in such cases. In addition the checking of the model assumptions is much easier in a simple linear regression compared to the linear probability model estimated via AMEs. > Likewise I think an odds ratio can be helpful, but to make it really helpful > it is useful to see how predictions differ across baseline levels, e.g it > makes a difference whether the baseline odds are a million to 1 or 1:1, and > these baseline odds will differ across individuals. This is also true for AMEs: .5 percentage points increase means something very different when the baseline is .5% or 50%. For example, if we look at the percentage of university students than a .5 percentage point increase when one starts for .5% means that the employees have to teach twice as many students and that twice as many students have to fit in the lecture halls. From the perspective of the universities the .5 percentage points increase represents a major change. If one however started with 50% university students than the .5 percentage point increase would be much easier to absorb by the universities, and that .5 percentage point would now represent a small change. In essence the problem with AMEs/linear probability models is that the coefficients aren't relative, while the problem with odds ratios is that the coefficients aren't absolute. However, in both cases one needs to know the baseline in order to properly interpret the effect size. Hope this helps, Maarten -------------------------- Maarten L. Buis Institut fuer Soziologie Universitaet Tuebingen Wilhelmstrasse 36 72074 Tuebingen Germany http://www.maartenbuis.nl -------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**Re: st: MIXLOGIT: marginal effects***From:*Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>

**Re: st: MIXLOGIT: marginal effects***From:*Arne Risa Hole <arnehole@gmail.com>

**Re: st: MIXLOGIT: marginal effects***From:*Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>

**Re: st: MIXLOGIT: marginal effects***From:*Arne Risa Hole <arnehole@gmail.com>

**Re: st: MIXLOGIT: marginal effects***From:*Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>

**Re: st: MIXLOGIT: marginal effects***From:*Richard Williams <richardwilliams.ndu@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: MIXLOGIT: marginal effects** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: Use of data originating from SPSS - update** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: MIXLOGIT: marginal effects** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: MIXLOGIT: marginal effects** - Index(es):