Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Question on xtgls


From   Steve Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Question on xtgls
Date   Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:46:16 -0500

I'm not expert in this area, Phil, but the -help- references www.stata-journal.com/sjpdf.html?articlenum=st0084.  There panels get  dummy variables, -i.e. different means.

Steve
sjsamuels@gmail.com


On Dec 9, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Bromiley, Philip wrote:

I'm having a little trouble understanding xtgls.  The documentation (e.g., page 154 of Stata 12 XT manual) seems to make clear that it is not putting in fixed or random effects for panels but rather is just allowing a complex error structure within panels and across panels.

This seems like a different model that what we normally mean by panel estimators.  We normally want to allow the mean error to vary by panel (in the u(i,t) term).

However, it seems like xtgls retains the assumption that the mean error has expectation zero (with the exception of serial correlation), even though it allows the variance and so forth to vary by panel.

What am I missing?


Phil


Philip Bromiley
Dean's Professor of Strategic Management
Merage School of Business
University of California, Irvine
Irvine, CA  92697-3125
(949) 824-6657

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index